The arrest of a senior police officer in Nairobi has opened a fresh debate over police discretion, constitutional rights and the handling of protest related arrests in Kenya.
On Tuesday, the Law Society of Kenya said it would defend Nairobi Central Police Station OCS Dishen Angoya after he was detained over the release of 64 suspects arrested during demonstrations linked to rising fuel prices and the high cost of living.
Police authorities accused Mr Angoya of improperly authorising the release of the suspects, some of whom had been picked up during chaotic scenes in the capital a day earlier. Senior officers claimed the move amounted to abuse of office and granting unlawful favours to detainees.
But the lawyers’ body sharply disagreed.
In a statement, LSK President Charles Kanjama said the officer appeared to have acted within powers granted to police commanders under Kenyan law.
“Punishing officers for exercising lawful discretion could create fear within the service and undermine constitutional protections,” Mr Kanjama said.
The remarks added another layer to an already tense national conversation over policing and civil liberties following recent protests that paralysed parts of Nairobi and other towns.
According to police accounts, Mr Angoya was arrested by senior commanders attached to the Nairobi region and later taken to Lang’ata Police Station for questioning. Reports indicated he complained of health complications shortly after the arrest.
Authorities have not publicly detailed whether the released suspects were facing formal charges at the time they were freed.
Legal analysts said the dispute centres on how much authority station commanders hold when handling suspects arrested during public unrest. Under Kenyan law, police officers can in some cases release suspects on police bond before they appear in court.
Critics of the arrest argued that the decision risks politicising operational police work, particularly during periods of public demonstrations.
Others, however, maintained that officers must still follow clear legal procedures, especially in cases involving mass arrests tied to unrest and destruction of property.
The demonstrations themselves were sparked by mounting frustration over fuel prices and the broader economic strain facing many households. In several areas, protests turned violent, with businesses damaged and vehicles set ablaze.
Government officials defended the security crackdown, saying police were acting to restore order and protect property.
Yet rights groups warned against excessive force and arbitrary arrests, concerns that have repeatedly surfaced during periods of political unrest in Kenya.
At the moment, the case against Mr Angoya is likely to intensify scrutiny of both the police service and the government’s wider response to dissent.
About the Author
