Paul Gaitho, Uthiru Chief in Kiambu reignited a fierce debate by calling for the return of corporal punishment in schools. He said society’s moral fabric is fraying, especially among young people.
Chief Paul Kibara Gaitho, speaking at a security forum chaired by Interior Cabinet Secretary Kipchumba Murkomen on 18 August, said the decline in discipline stems from idleness at home and school. “The youth are lazy. They smoke a lot of bhang. They are idlers,” he said, adding that many seem to believe life requires no effort. “Even according to Bible standards, one has to eat from his own sweat.”
He warned that children are growing up without discipline. When they join university, he said, even if they excel academically, they struggle in the workplace. “They are sacked and turn to alcohol. Eventually, they go to those chang’aa dens,” he added.
Chief Gaitho also described a culture of mockery among youth who chant “wantam” a slang phrase referring to a presidential term viewing it as a sign of nonchalance.
Mr Murkomen responded with measured resolve. He agreed that drug abuse is tearing through communities and promised to crack down on illegal alcohol produced by unlicensed operators. He added that gang crime and extortion, especially against small traders and passenger vehicle operators, were rising concerns. He pledged swift action and stronger policing.
As part of the response, he said the government plans to bolster community structures such as Nyumba Kumi, engage local leaders and involve religious figures and student representatives in security committees.
Analysis and Context
Corporal punishment in Kenya has a long, controversial history. In the past, several officials advocated for its return amid concerns over discipline. For instance, former Interior CS Fred Matiang’i and Education CS George Magoha urged a national conversation about reinstating the cane to counter indiscipline in schools. But there was also strong opposition: critics argued it breeds resentment and note that even after caning was banned, incidents of misbehavior persisted.
Human rights experts and child welfare advocates say that physical discipline can have harmful long-term effects. They recommend dialogue, counselling and stronger family engagement instead.
Voices from the Public
On forums like Reddit, former students have spoken candidly about their experiences. One wrote:
“The class 8 teachers used fan belts… I once got a 94 in science and got whopped so bad my hands turned purple… I had to wet the shirt as it had come stuck on the wounds on my back.”
Another reflected on the emotional toll:
“Back in primary schools… teachers were very ruthless… scars… could be causing PTSD in many of us.”
Such recollections point to how corporal punishment, even when common, can leave lasting scars—physical and psychological.
Critics argue that punishment by physical means may damage the relationship between teacher and pupil and has limited impact on behavior. They suggest investing in mentorship, parental training and counselling instead.
Neither side disputes that indiscipline is a real challenge. The debate centers on how best to respond.













